Research Article

The Impact of Transcatheter Atrial Septal Defect Closure on Ventricular Repolarization Parameters in Children: Results from a 15-Year Single-Center Tertiary Care Experience

10.32596/ejcm.galenos.2023.2023-1-6

  • Kaan Yıldız
  • Mustafa Kır
  • Coşkun Armağan
  • Halise Zeynep Genç
  • Veysel Çeliktepe
  • Hazer Ercan Bozyer
  • Yağmur Damla Akçura
  • Hüseyin Bardak
  • Yunus Sezer Bayam
  • Nurettin Ünal

Received Date: 25.07.2023 Accepted Date: 21.08.2023 E J Cardiovasc Med 2023;11(3):101-107

Objectives:

Atrial and ventricular arrhythmias can be observed in children after transcatheter atrial septal defect (ASD) closure. This study investigated ventricular repolarization parameters, which are considered to indicate an increased risk of arrhythmias in patients with transcatheter ASD closure.

Materials and Methods:

The study included 225 patients aged 0-18 years who underwent transcatheter ASD closure at a tertiary medical school university hospital between 2005 and 2020. Heart rate, Pmax, Pmin, Pdispersion, QTmax, QTmin, QTdispersion, QTcmax, QTcmin, QTcdispersion, Tp-e interval, Tp-e/QT, and Tp-e/QTc values were calculated electronically in 12-lead electrocardiographies (ECGs) taken before the procedure and at 24 h, 1, 6, and 12 months after the procedure.

Results:

Of the 225 patients who underwent transcatheter closure, 144 (64%) were female and 81 (36%) were male. The mean age at angiography was 9.2±4.1 years, and the mean weight was 29.6±14.3 kg. Statistically significant differences were observed in the Tp-e interval and Tp-e/QTc values measured before transcatheter closure compared with those measured after closure (p=0.028; p=0.032), while no significant differences were found between the two groups in terms of other ECG parameters. A negative correlation was found between P and QT dispersion measured before transcatheter closure and after closure (r=-0.408; p=0.041).

Conclusion:

Changes in ventricular repolarization parameters were observed in children after transcatheter ASD closure. QT dispersion, Tp-e interval, and Tp-e/QTc ratios, which are sensitive indicators of ventricular arrhythmias, were significant in the post-closure group. Therefore, careful evaluation of these parameters, which are markers for predicting ventricular arrhythmias before and after ASD closure, will serve as a warning for potentially fatal arrhythmias of vital importance in the long term. Each patient undergoing transcatheter ASD closure should be monitored with a 12-lead ECG for atrial and ventricular depolarization and repolarization parameters, and annual 24-hour Holter ECG monitoring should be performed to detect arrhythmias.

Keywords: Atrial septal defect, transcatheter closure, electrocardiography, ventricular repolarization, pediatric

Introduction

Atrial septal defect (ASD) is one of the most common congenital heart diseases(1). This defect has been closed surgically for many years. In particular, for secondum-type ASDs suitable for transcatheter closure, patient comfort, absence of surgical scarring, and shorter hospital stays have replaced surgical treatment(2). In the past decade, secondum ASDs have been closed percutaneously using various devices(3). Hemodynamically significant large defects can be closed transcatheters, even in infancy, in appropriate cases(4). In ASDs, right ventricular hypertrophy findings on electrocardiography (ECG) due to right ventricular dilation and an incomplete right bundle branch block pattern associated with prolonged depolarization time can be observed. This situation leads to long-term negative effects on left heart size and function. To prevent the development of arrhythmias, it is recommended that ASDs diagnosed in childhood and causing significant volume load in right heart cavities be closed, if possible, before school age(5,6).

Increased atrial distension and volume load due to congenital electrophysiological changes in the sinus node or conduction system play a role in the development of sinus node dysfunction and atrial tachycardia(7). In the myocardium continuously exposed to volume loading, stress spreads to tissues in the cardiac conduction system, causing delayed intraventricular conduction. In addition, the degeneration of cardiac cells, including fibrosis secondary to myocardial remodeling, leads to the pathological modification of myocardial repolarization. Because of these changes in the left ventricle, arrhythmogenic values can occur in P wave and QT measurements. Delayed cardiac repolarization increases susceptibility to arrhythmias(8-10). The presence of arrhythmia episodes in patients undergoing transcatheter closure has also been demonstrated in many studies(11,12).

In previous studies, it has been shown that some ventricular repolarization parameters such as the QT interval, corrected QT (QTc) interval, QT and QTc dispersions (QTd, QTcd), T peak-end (Tp-e), and Tp-e/QT ratio indicate susceptibility to ventricular arrhythmias(13-15). There are limited studies in the literature regarding ventricular repolarization parameters, which are accepted to increase the risk of ventricular arrhythmias in children with ASDs and evaluated RR and Qt variability, and in those with VSD(16,17).

This study investigated ventricular repolarization parameters, which are considered to indicate an increased risk of arrhythmias in patients with transcatheter ASD closure.


Materials and Methods

Between January 2005 and January 2020, 225 patients aged 0-18 who underwent transcatheter ASD closure at the Department of Pediatric Cardiology, Dokuz Eylül University Faculty of Medicine were included. The medical records of the patients were evaluated retrospectively. Patients with concomitant congenital cardiac abnormalities and those with incomplete data were excluded from the study. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Dokuz Eylül University Faculty of Medicine, in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki (dated: 15/02/2021, approval no: 2021/05-19).

In the transcatheter closure procedure, the Amplatzer Duct Occluder II device was used for all patients. Twelve-lead ECGs taken before closure, at 24 h, and 1, 6, and 12 months after the procedure were evaluated. Heart rate, Pmax, Pmin, Pdispersion, QTmax, QTmin, QTdispersion, QTcmax, QTcmin, QTc dispersion, Tp-e interval, Tp-e/QT, and Tp-e/QTc were calculated electronically. Data were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics Standard Concurrent User V 26 (IBM Corp., Armonk, New York, USA) statistical software package. The normal distribution of numerical variables was evaluated using the Shapiro-Wilk normality test. The homogeneity of variances was assessed using the Levene test. Independent two-sample t-tests were used for intergroup comparisons of variables with a normal distribution. The relationship between ECG variables before and after the transcatheter closure procedure was assessed using Pearson correlation analysis. A p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.


Results

Of the 225 patients who underwent transcatheter closure, 144 (64%) were female and 81 (36%) were male. The mean age at angiography was 9.2±4.1 years, and the mean weight was 29.6±14.3 kg. When evaluated according to the World Health Organization Z-score for body weight, it was calculated as -0.2±1.09 standard deviation score. In all cases, transesophageal echocardiography was routinely performed during the closure procedure, and the measured defect diameter varied between 8 and 21 mm, with a mean of 12.2±3.9 mm. The mean pulmonary artery pressure calculated during catheterization was 14.3±3.2 mmHg, and the mean Qp/Q ratio was 1.86±0.48. The mean follow-up period was 5.8±3.1 (1.9-14.2) years (Table 1).

In all 225 patients,  sinus rhythm was observed in the ECGs taken before the procedure. First-degree atrioventricular (AV) block was observed in three patients. In the control ECGs taken 24 h after the procedure, all patients were found to be in sinus rhythm. Ectopic atrial arrhythmia was detected in only six of our cases; two were observed temporarily, and the remaining four were assessed as AV node conduction abnormalities (Table 2). No new arrhythmias developed in the early period. The control ECGs of the cases were taken at median values of 5.6 (3.2-15.1) years.

The Tp-e interval and Tp-e/QTc values measured before the transcatheter closure procedure were found to be statistically significant compared with those after the closure (p=0.028; p=0.032). In contrast, no significant difference was observed between the two groups regarding other ECG parameters (p>0.05) (Table 3).

A negative correlation was found between pre-transcatheter closure P dispersion and post-closure QT dispersion (r=-0.408; p=0.041) (Table 4).


Discussion

In patients undergoing transcatheter ASD closure, echocardiographic evaluation of device position, residual shunt presence, and complications (erosion, embolization, etc.) should be performed within the first 24 h following device implantation. Due to the rare risk of blockage reported with the use of large devices, a 12-lead ECG should be taken for each patient after the procedure(18). Post-procedure follow-up should be performed at 1, 6, and 12 months and then every 1-2 years for atrial arrhythmias. At each check-up, patients should be evaluated by physical examination, ECG, and echocardiography. Although ECGs with normal or right-axis deviation along with right bundle branch block are considered indicative of ASD, electrophysiological studies have claimed that there is no true electrical delay and that the block is mostly due to volume load(19).

In 25 pediatric patients with transcatheter ASD closure, Pmax and P-wave dispersion (PWD) parameters were evaluated before and after the closure procedure, and it was found that the closure significantly reduced Pmax and PWD(20). P-wave dispersion is an electrocardiographic marker that reveals the heterogeneity of electrical conduction in both atria(21). The usability of P-wave duration and PWD in predicting paroxysmal idiopathic atrial fibrillation (AF) has been demonstrated in adult electrophysiological studies. Intra-atrial conduction delay leads to an increase in P-wave duration and PWD, predisposing patients to AF. P-wave dispersion of 40 ms has been reported as a risk factor for AF(22,23). In a meta-analysis investigating AF development after transcatheter ASD closure in adults, it was noted that AF was less frequent in the early period after closure, whereas the rate increased in older patients(24). Changes in the atrium before the closure procedure in children with large ASDs may predispose them to AF later in life(14). In our study, PWD in the preclosure group was statistically significant compared with that in the postclosure group. Close monitoring of these children for AF development potential in adult life may be beneficial in terms of morbidity and mortality.

The following ASD closure, the development of ventricular arrhythmia was observed. This is because the device causes changes in the heart anatomy, leading to ventricular irritation. In addition, the electrical activity of the heart may change after ASD closure, increasing the risk of ventricular arrhythmia(12). Non-invasive parameters indicating increased propensity for ventricular arrhythmias include QT, QTc intervals, and QT and QTc dispersions. Prolongations in QT and QTc values indicate an extended ventricular repolarization, whereas increased QT and QTc dispersion values indicate that ventricular repolarization is not homogenous, and the propensity for ventricular arrhythmias is increased(25,26). In our study, QT dispersion was statistically significant in the post-closure group compared with the pre-closure group.

In addition to QT and QTc dispersions, the Tp-e interval and Tp-e/QT ratio, which are ECG markers of ventricular transmural repolarization dispersion, have been used recently as relatively newer indicators. Experimental studies have shown that the earliest repolarization occurs in epicardial cells, which is reflected as a T-wave peak in surface ECG. The end of the T wave (Tend) represents the mid-myocardial action potential’s reflection on the surface ECG(27,28).

Consequently, the Tp-e interval represents the transmural repolarization dispersion. Studies have shown that prolonged Tp-e duration is associated with mortality in cases of Brugada syndrome, long QT syndrome, and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy(29,30). In addition to the Tp-e interval, the Tpe/QT and Tp-e/QTc ratios have been found to be associated with ventricular arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death(26). In our study, the Tp-e interval and Tp-e/QTc ratios were found to be statistically significant in the post-closure group.

Study Limitations

Possible limitations of this study are that our results may be limited to our population and therefore have limited applicability to the general population. To confirm these results, it is necessary to conduct a long-term follow-up of the patients in the study and further studies with the new data to be obtained.


Conclusion

In conclusion, changes in ventricular repolarization parameters were observed in children after transcatheter ASD closure. However, the clinical significance of these changes and their relationship with ventricular arrhythmia risk have not been fully determined. In our study, although there was no significant difference between the pre- and post-closure groups in terms of ECG parameters indicating susceptibility to ventricular arrhythmias, such as QT, QTc duration, and QTc dispersion, the QT dispersion, Tp-e interval, and Tp-e/QTc ratios, which have been shown to be more sensitive in detecting ventricular arrhythmias in previous studies, were significant in the post-closure group. The risk of fatal arrhythmias in children after transcatheter ASD closure is very low, but it can lead to serious consequences(31). Therefore, careful evaluation of these parameters, which are markers for predicting ventricular arrhythmias before and after ASD closure, will be a warning for potentially life-threatening fatal arrhythmias in the long term. Each patient undergoing transcatheter ASD closure should be monitored with a 12-lead ECG for atrial and ventricular depolarization and repolarization parameters, and annual 24-hour Holter ECG monitoring should be performed to detect arrhythmias.

Ethics

Ethics Committee Approval: The study was approved by the ethics committee of Dokuz Eylül University Faculty of Medicine, in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki (dated: 15/02/2021, approval no: 2021/05-19).

Informed Consent: Retrospective study.

Peer-reviewed: Externally peer-reviewed.

Authorship Contributions

Surgical and Medical Practices: Kır M, Ünal N, Concept: Yıldız K, Design: Yıldız K, Data Collection and/or Processing: Armağan C, Genç HZ, Çeliktepe V, Analysis and/or Interpretation: Bardak H, Bayam YS, Literature Search: Ercan Bozyer H, Bayam YS, Writing: Yıldız K.

Conflict of Interest: The authors declare no conflicts of interest concerning the authorship or publication of this article.

Financial Disclosure: This research received no specific grants from any funding agency in the commercial or not-for-profit sectors.


Images

  1. van der Linde D, Konings EE, Slager MA, et al. Birth prevalence of congenital heart disease worldwide: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011;58:2241-7.
  2. Du ZD, Hijazi ZM, Kleinman CS, Silverman NH, Larntz K; Amplatzer Investigators. Comparison between transcatheter and surgical closure of secundum atrial septal defect in children and adults: results of a multicenter nonrandomized trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002;39:1836-44.
  3. Vishwanath V, Akseer S, Frankfurter C, et al. Comparative effectiveness of devices for transcatheter closure of atrial septal defects: Systematic review and network meta-analysis. Arch Cardiovasc Dis 2022;115:664-74.
  4. Narin N, Baspinar O, Pamukcu O, et al. Percutaneous ASD closure of children weighing less than 10 kg. Acta Cardiol 2020;75:631-6.
  5. Chubb H, Whitaker J, Williams SE, et al. Pathophysiology and Management of Arrhythmias Associated with Atrial Septal Defect and Patent Foramen Ovale. Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev 2014;3:168-72.
  6. Morton JB, Sanders P, Vohra JK, et al. Effect of chronic right atrial stretch on atrial electrical remodeling in patients with an atrial septal defect. Circulation 2003;107:1775-82.
  7. Williams MR, Perry JC. Arrhythmias and conduction disorders associated with atrial septal defects. J Thorac Dis 2018;10(Suppl 24):S2940-4.
  8. Folino AF, Buja G, Bauce B, Thiene G, dalla Volta S, Nava A. Heart rate variability in arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy correlation with clinical and prognostic features. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2002;25:1285-92.
  9. Baumert M, Porta A, Vos MA, et al. QT interval variability in body surface ECG: measurement, physiological basis, and clinical value: position statement and consensus guidance endorsed by the European Heart Rhythm Association jointly with the ESC Working Group on Cardiac Cellular Electrophysiology. Europace 2016;18:925-44.
  10. Kusuki H, Kuriki M, Horio K, et al. Beat-to-beat QT interval variability in children: normal and physiologic data. J Electrocardiol 2011;44:326-9.
  11. Cenk M, Akalın F, Şaylan BÇ, Ak K. P wave dispersion in assessment of dysrhythmia risk in patients with secundum type atrial septal defect and the effect of transcatheter or surgical closure. Cardiol Young 2020;30:263-70.
  12. Roushdy AM, Attia H, Nossir H. Immediate and short term effects of percutaneous atrial septal defect device closure on cardiac electrical remodeling in children. Egypt Heart J 2018;70:243-7.
  13. Kamphuis VP, Nassif M, Man SC, et al. Electrical remodeling after percutaneous atrial septal defect closure in pediatric and adult patients. Int J Cardiol 2019;285:32-9.
  14. Santoro G, Pascotto M, Sarubbi B, et al. Early electrical and geometric changes after percutaneous closure of large atrial septal defect. Am J Cardiol 2004;93:876-80.
  15. Sap F, Karataş Z, Altin H, et al. Dispersion durations of P-wave and QT interval in children with congenital heart disease and pulmonary arterial hypertension. Pediatr Cardiol 2013;34:591-6.
  16. Uchida H, Nishio M, Omeki Y, et al. Variability of Myocardial Repolarization in Pediatric Patients with a Ventricular Septal Defect. Pediatr Cardiol 2016;37:1458-64.
  17. Eryu Y, Hata T, Nagatani A, et al. Electrocardiographic RR and QT Interval Variability in Patients with Atrial Septal Defect and Healthy Children. Pediatr Cardiol 2017;38:582-7.
  18. Agarwal YK, Aronow WS, Levy JA, Spodick DH. Association of interatrial block with development of atrial fibrillation. Am J Cardiol 2003;91:882.
  19. Sung RJ, Tamer DM, Agha AS, Castellanos A, Myerburg RJ, Gelband H. Etiology of the electrocardiographic pattern of “incomplete right bundle branch block” in atrial septal defect: an electrophysiologic study. J Pediatr 1975;87(6 Pt 2):1182-6.
  20. Grignani RT, Tolentino KM, Rajgor DD, Quek SC. Longitudinal evaluation of P-wave dispersion and P-wave maximum in children after transcatheter device closure of secundum atrial septal defect. Pediatr Cardiol 2015;36:1050-6.
  21. Köse S, Kiliç A, Iyisoy A, Kurşaklioğlu H, Lenk MK. P wave duration and P dispersion in healthy children. Turk J Pediatr 2003;45:133-5.
  22. Dilaveris PE, Gialafos EJ, Sideris SK, et al. Simple electrocardiographic markers for the prediction of paroxysmal idiopathic atrial fibrillation. Am Heart J 1998;135(5 Pt 1):733-8.
  23. Aytemir K, Ozer N, Atalar E, et al. P wave dispersion on 12-lead electrocardiography in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2000;23:1109-12.
  24. Himelfarb JD, Shulman H, Olesovsky CJ, et al. Atrial fibrillation following transcatheter atrial septal defect closure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Heart 2022;108:1216-24.
  25. Elming H, Holm E, Jun L, et al. The prognostic value of the QT interval and QT interval dispersion in all-cause and cardiac mortality and morbidity in a population of Danish citizens. Eur Heart J 1998;19:1391-400.
  26. Karadeniz C, Ozdemir R, Demir F, et al. Increased P-wave and QT dispersions necessitate long-term follow-up evaluation of Down syndrome patients with congenitally normal hearts. Pediatr Cardiol 2014;35:1344-8. 
  27. Antzelevitch C, Sicouri S, Di Diego JM, et al. Does Tpeak-Tend provide an index of transmural dispersion of repolarization? Heart Rhythm 2007;4:1114-6; author reply 1116-9.
  28. Shimizu M, Ino H, Okeie K, et al. T-peak to T-end interval may be a better predictor of high-risk patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy associated with a cardiac troponin I mutation than QT dispersion. Clin Cardiol 2002;25:335-9.
  29. Castro Hevia J, Antzelevitch C, Tornés Bárzaga F, et al. Tpeak-Tend and Tpeak-Tend dispersion as risk factors for ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation in patients with the Brugada syndrome. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;47:1828-34.
  30. Shimizu M, Ino H, Okeie K, et al. T-peak to T-end interval may be a better predictor of high-risk patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy associated with a cardiac troponin I mutation than QT dispersion. Clin Cardiol 2002;25:335-9.
  31. Castro-Torres Y, Carmona-Puerta R, Katholi RE. Ventricular repolarization markers for predicting malignant arrhythmias in clinical practice. World J Clin Cases 2015;3:705-20.